From: g87@optusnet.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 10:57 AM
To: Complaints
Subject: TO ETHAN - 14/10/15...Hi Ethan.. Seidner: 2015/3329
[DLM=For-Official-Use-Only]
Dear Ethan
Thanks for your work and the effort your Department has
put into doing things properly. Very much appreciated.
I am pleased to give my consent for your people to go ahead and to
investigate matters as per below in your email to me of today’s
date.
This formal commentary from me is in accordance with previous email from
you – wherein you wrote as below inviting me to ‘’provide my input’’
This I have done to the best of my ability with consideration to a degree
of understanding that I have gleaned of the workings of Family Law.
My earlier concerns were that Catholic Care would be able to respond to
SOME of the points by claiming that they did no wrong [!] in [at least!] some of
what they did and plainly allowed
Dr Howard Zeimer to do.
From my recollection is that Catholic Care theoretically could claim – as
they did in one of their emails... http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/cc12-my-reply-to-nick-dated-july-23.html
that it is not their role to check the validity of the respective claims.
SO TO SPEAK.
See this tangent immediately below:
‘’It is also
completely inappropriate for Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners to
corroborate, substantiate or validate one party’s version of events.
As such we
cannot respond to your emails about the specific details of your situation.
‘’
It is obvious that this is plainly a thoroughly – discreditable idea. If it
was correct – and with due consideration to the multiple resources in Family Law
that plainly contradict it –
the entire MEDIATION / FDR process becomes a mockery.
Which is precisely what CATHOLIC CARE AND DR HOWARD ZEIMER
COORDINATED!
I have indeed decimated every chimeric excuses from CATHOLIC CARE.
INCLUDING THE ABOVE HYPOTHETICAL ONE THAT COULD BE RAISED BY THEM AGAIN.
Indeed there were other matters of minor concern which do not seem to be
important. All surely covered by thorough documentation should they DARE to
raise same.
Manifestly the indictments if only this final version - are devastating:
they have indeed committed acts that are unfathomable. Illegal.
outrageous.
I also note your and your department’s generosity of the inevitable
duplications in these correspondences.
Once again – thank you all.
No doubt you will be able to email me and post as well the final papers as
earlier discussed.
Regards
Geoff Seidner
‘’Dear Geoff,
As discussed, please see below the first draft
of the key concerns that will be submitted to the area within the Department of
Social Services that will assess if your complaint can be looked into.
As discussed with you on the phone, this is
only a draft and I actively seek your input into the points below, please feel
free to edit the words below also.
The key concerns listed below are focused on the
areas where you feel you have had a negative experience with Catholic Care and I
encourage you to add in any extra points that I may have
missed due to the complex nature of this enquiry.
Please be advised that all documents (emails, blogs etc) previously submitted by
you will accompany your key concerns to the relevant
area within the Department of Social
Services.’’
##############################################################################################
#################################################################################################
#################################################################################################
From: Complaints
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 8:27 AM
Cc: Complaints
Subject: RE: Hi Ethan.. Seidner: 2015/3329
[DLM=For-Official-Use-Only]
Dear
Geoff,
I have been liaising
with the team looking into your concerns and they have provided a response to
your amended key concerns. Please see their response
below:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Thank you for your
email of 30 September 2015 regarding the changes you are seeking to the key
concerns that this Department have highlighted in the Complaints Recording
Template.
The Department’s
role in this matter is to look into your concerns to determine if the terms and
conditions of the grant agreement between the Department of Social Services and
CatholicCare Victoria Tasmania through CatholicCare Melbourne has been met.
The Department will consider how CatholicCare Victoria Tasmania responds to, and
provides supporting evidence, regarding how it has acted in relation to the
Family Dispute Resolution Service they provided to you.
The Department has
noted your requested changes and we will accept the requested change to point 3
and change the word “mural” to “mosaic”. However, the additional wording you
have requested does not alter the Department’s capacity to assess the nine key
issues in a timely manner and make a determination as to whether the
organisation has met their grant agreement requirements. Additionally as the
Department is only able to investigate factual information which relate to the
nine key concerns, we are unable to review information which could be perceived
as opinion and/or subjective.
Please also note
that the Department is only able to look into claims made against the grant
recipient in this case CatholicCare Victoria Tasmania and is not able to contact
any third party in this matter.
I am therefore
seeking your agreement for the Department to proceed with the following nine
issues which we have previously communicated with you.
1.
That Catholic Care
failed in their primary duty of providing a balanced mediation between you and
Mr Zeimer.
2.
That mediator
Jenkins accepted claims by Mr Zeimer that you and your wife were causing alleged
distress to your grandchildren when they were participating in scheduled visits
to you. And, that mediator Jenkins didn’t consider whether or not Mr Zeimer and
his wife were actually causing unnecessary duress to the children.
3.
That mediator
Jenkins failed to investigate whether or not alleged stress being experienced by
the grandchildren was being caused by a mosaic, being constructed at their
school, in honour of their deceased mother.
4.
That mediator
Jenkins allowed mediation to proceed without acknowledgement of affidavits from
Mr Zeimer, as well as relevant court documents (including explanations of the
grandchildren’s medical ailments).
5.
That mediator
Jenkins allowed mediation to proceed without allowing you the opportunity to
point out Mr Zeimer’s claims against you, claims made years prior which were
proven to be fraudulent by the family court.
6.
That mediator
Jenkins did not consult with you and used her own initiative to ensure that you
and your wife would not meet face to face with Mr Zeimer during mediation
sessions.
7.
That based on a
meeting with mediator Jenkins, Mr Zeimer stopped the grandchildren’s visits to
you and your wife, despite court orders permitting scheduled visits. These
court orders were provided to Jenkins and they were
ignored.
8.
That Catholic Care
leaked your private documents with Catholic Care to Mr
Zeimer.
9.
That Catholic Care
and Gadens solicitors, wrote to the grandchildren’s school, banning you and your
wife from visiting their school by misrepresenting Court
Documents.
Kind
Regards
Ethan
Feedback
Coordination Team
Ph:
1800 634 035
Fax:
(02) 6133 8442
Post:
Feedback, PO Box 7576, Canberra Business Centre, ACT 2610
From:
g87@optusnet.com.au [mailto:g87@optusnet.com.au]
Sent: Monday, 12 October 2015 1:43 PM
To: Complaints
Subject: Hi Ethan..
Sent: Monday, 12 October 2015 1:43 PM
To: Complaints
Subject: Hi Ethan..
DSS
Hi
Ethan
Hope to hear from you
soon re our complaints against the Catholic Care and Dr Howard
Zeimer.
Regards
Geoff
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.