Friday, November 13, 2015

DSS 32: SUMMARY GRAVE ERROR No. 1.... NOV 13

Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 1:30 PM
Subject: MY FRIDAY'S NOV 13 EMAIL CANCELLED HEREWITH FOR LACK OF CLARITY

Dear Ethan .....
AND MANAGER OF DSS CANBERRA
Your Reference: 2015/3329
The below email sent to you on FRIDAY NOV. 13 contains no errors from my person – but it fails the clarity and STRUCTURAL test even though your people will understand it all far too well, I suspect.
However all will be expanded upon in my inimitably thorough way. VERY SOON!!!! It may also be a sound idea for the DSS to wait a few days before responding. You will have something surely to convey to the party / parties who will be handling my multiple complaints against your DSS et al!!
You may also care to ensure that you sign with your full name the original of your email of the infamous ‘FINAL REPORT as promised and discussed.
Indeed – what is your name?
Oh and use your full name for future communications please: I do not understand why I did not ask you before: it seems improper to communicate without name disclosure: how can the public service do this?
AND  INSURE YOUR MANAGER SO CONVEYS HIS FULL NAME AND STATUS AS WELL.
ALL THIS EMAIL will now be ‘parked’ in my COGNATE CONFIDENTIAL BLOG. AND USED AS A REFERENCE FOR FUTURE CLAIMS AGAINST VARIOUS PARTIES – INCLUDING YOURSELVES.
Here is the link to this blog:    


I point out that this ‘COGNATE’ blog contains an amalgam / a veritable warehouse of my claims against Catholic Care.

And of course other parties.

It can be viewed as a ‘rough – and – ready’ index of decreptitudenous outrage manifested BY ALL THE BELOW
  1. HOWARD ZEIMER AND HIS WIFE
  2. DR PETER ADLER
  3. GADENS SOLICITORS
  4. THE LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION
  5. CATHOLIC CARE
  6. AND NOW THE DSS!!


Shame on ye all!


That any or all could dare to think that the Australian Legal system could allow you to think that what ye all have done is legally morally acceptable?!!!

AND THINK NOT THAT I FAIL TO REALIZE THAT EVERY STEP I TAKE TO SEEK JUSTICE AND UNCOVER ALL THE MULTIFARIOUS FRAUD – AND FAIL BY FRAUD BEING FOISTED ON ME, COULD MAKE THE COURTS [WHEREVER THIS MAY GO IS MY BUSINESS!!] THINK THAT I AM ‘TILTING AT WINDMILLS’ – AND / OR THERE IS NO MERIT IN WHAT I CLAIM!!!



Shame on ye all.



The DSS is merely the latest scam – merchant – and I verily tell you here that you will wish you did not mess with me s

imply: your malfeasances are the worst arguably because you have knowledge of what went before you!


WHICH SADLY, YOU AND THE CATHOLIC CARE ESSENTIALLY, MANIFESTLY IGNORED.

NOTE PLEASE THAT THIS COGNATE BLOG WAS CREATED TO ENABLE ANYONE TO RAPIDLY FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH THE SHOCKING MULTIPLE FRAUDS AND CHIMERAS CREATED BY VARIOUS PARTIES TO THIS TRAGIC MATTER OF MY WIFE AND MYSELF BEING ILLEGALLY EVISCERATED ONCE AGAIN FROM CONTACT WITH OUR BELOVED GRANDCHILDREN ZEIMER.


You will be sent further comments over the next period of unspecified time. Kindly note that these incipient comments over said unspecified time will represent claims against the DSS. And other parties of course.


REPEAT: THE BELOW DOES NOT OFFICIALLY EXIST AND WILL BE USED AS A REFERENCE IN MY COGNATE BLOG: SEE ABOVE>

Regards

Geoff Seidner


###############################################
#################################################


Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 11:23 AM
Subject: GS: GRAVE ERROR NO. 1... INITIAL RESPONSE TO 'FINAL REPORT' ex DSS dated Nov 13 2015
SUMMARY GRAVE ERROR No. 1
DSS misrepresentation re Catholic Care allegedly writing to childrens’ school

To Ethan

C / DSS

Department of Social Services, Australian Government
Dear Ethan
I am in receipt of  your ‘FINAL REPORT’ sent via email yesterday.
See it appended as per link here. http://seidnerconfidential.blogspot.com.au/2015/11/dss-31-ex-nov-12final-response-from.html
As agreed kindly send me a ‘hard copy’ as earlier discussed.
Please note that I am somewhat disturbed by your department’s findings. In due course it is expected that much more will be written on various failures of the DSS.
Simultaneously I will be commencing communication with other parties. SOON.
It is reasonable for me to think kindly of the DSS: that if merely with respect to this single misrepresentation – your people will want to correct it.
It matters not much for now. Note that all this is prima facie documentation / evidence in / via my next actions -  that you surely must answer SOON.
You are kindly requested to comment as below. And you may care to await my further comments via email ...soon....
While it is plainly obvious that this matter is going to be reviewed by other authorities,  for now you are requested to note that I restrict myself to merely two [3] grave errors of the DSS.
MORE TO COME NEXT EMAILS!
By far the most serious is the DSS misrepresentation of my claim DSS 22 below ‘’...that  Gadens solicitors or Zeimer wrote to the grandchildren’s school...’’ 
IT BECAME SOMETHING ELSE VIA THE DSS MISREPRESENTING IT THUS:
AS FOLLOWS:
‘’9. That Catholic Care and Gadens solicitors, wrote to the grandchildren’s school, banning you and your wife from visiting their school by misrepresenting Court Documents.
NOTE – my claim was that it was ‘either Zeimer or Gadens solicitors’!!
Via this misrepresentation Catholic Care was allowed by DSS investigator to claim per your FINAL REPORT:
9. That CatholicCare and Gadens solicitors, wrote to the grandchildren’s school, banning you and your wife from visiting their school by misrepresenting Court Documents.CatholicCare has advised the Department that they did not write to or have any contact with the children’s school. There is no evidence on its file, or assessed as part of this review of your complaint, to support this claim.The Department considers that the explanation provided by CatholicCare Melbourne is appropriate and no further action will be taken
THIS MEMO WILL CONTINUE SOON -  AS I WISH YOU TO CONTEMPLATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF NOT ONLY MISREPRESENTING MY CLAIMS – BUT VIA THE MANIFEST MISREPRENTATION OF SAID CLAIMS PLAINLY CREATING A CHIMERA IN ALLOWING CATHOLIC CARE TO PLAINLY MISLEAD YOU – TO THUS PLAINLY TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOUR INVESTIGATOR’S NAIVETE – AND IN THE PROCESS ENABLED A COVER UP OF FRAUD.
This is serious business.
In consideration to the other major misrepresentations that I will elucidate SOON
Regards
Geoff Seidner
Again – please note that there are other matters your department will need to address; and so obviously correct grave errors that are will be obvious to other parties.
#########################################################################################
############################################################################################
DSS 25 C....DETAILS FROM ETHAN
http://seidnerconfidential.blogspot.com.au/2015/09/dss-25-cdetails-from-ethan.html
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 8:32 AM
Subject: DSS LETTER OF 29 Sept 2015
6. That mediator Jenkins did not consult with you and used her own initiative to ensure that you and your wife would not meet face to face with Mr Zeimer during mediation sessions.
7. That based on a meeting with mediator Jenkins, Mr Zeimer stopped the grandchildren’s visits to you and your wife, despite court orders permitting scheduled visits. These court orders were provided to Jenkins and they were ignored.
8. That Catholic Care leaked your private documents with Catholic Care to Mr Zeimer.
9. That Catholic Care and Gadens solicitors, wrote to the grandchildren’s school, banning you and your wife from visiting their school by misrepresenting Court Documents.
llll

DSS 25 D Sept 30 response to Ethan

‘’However often these rules and guidelines have been potentially ambiguous in simultaneously showing how CC behaviour was illegal and yet contain the elements of excuses that could be abused by CC.’’
The above chimeras are understood by reasonable people. To wit – that you could have minor / irrelevant contradictions – but they matter not in the general scheme of things when one considers deliberate malfeasances of a party!
Unfortunately CC obviously have during their prolix correspondences with me abused and debased their own rules!
It works like this.........’’

DSS 27,,,OCT. 14... GS AND ETHAN

It is obvious that this is plainly a thoroughly – discreditable idea. If it was correct – and with due consideration to the multiple resources in Family Law that plainly contradict it –
the entire MEDIATION / FDR process becomes a mockery.
Which is precisely what CATHOLIC CARE AND DR HOWARD ZEIMER COORDINATED!
I have indeed decimated every chimeric excuses from CATHOLIC CARE.
INCLUDING THE ABOVE HYPOTHETICAL ONE THAT COULD BE RAISED BY THEM AGAIN.
Indeed there were other matters of minor concern which do not seem to be important. All surely covered by thorough documentation should they DARE to raise same.
Manifestly the indictments if only this final version -  are devastating: they have indeed committed acts that are unfathomable. Illegal. outrageous.

DSS 22... 21 Sept..I rewrite earlier ex Sept 17 herein

10
I further allege that from the very beginning Catholic Care ensured the perversion  of the FDR process by ensuring that Howard Zeimer could get all he demanded in that HE WAS ALLOWED, IN COOPERATION WITH CC TO NOT MEET US! THIS WAS SO PLAINLY ORCHESTRATED BY CATHOLIC CARE AND ZEIMER. And here is the important part: this was also deemed by CC to be acceptable. One needs to follow the paper trail to appreciate the abomenated fraud within the claims of alleged proper process
11
Attempts to cover their MULTIPLE  frauds is extant throughout these correspondences.
12
I further allege that CC allowed Zeimer to make multiple fraudulent claims with respect to the sicknesses and alleged mental  state of the children claimed to be caused by us.All brilliantly debunked with documents by us – and studiously ignored!
13
I further allege that Zeimer was allowed the claim that the honour of the incipient mosaic that will be put up at the childrens’ school was also distressing to our beloved grandchildren! OH!
17
I further allege that CC plainly tried to hide Zeimer’s and Zeimer’s solicitor Gadens criminality in creating. passing on  fraudulent COURT DOCUMENTS  That Catholic Care leaked my  communications with CC - to Mr Zeimer. Very little documentation has been sent to DSS: IT NEEDS THE ATTENTION OF THE REGISTRAR OF COURTS AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL!
20
     That Catholic Care refused to contemplate – far from passing on a crime to the authorities which the FAMILY LAW ACT REQUIRES -  that  Gadens solicitors or Zeimer wrote to the grandchildren’s school, illegally banning my wife and myself from attending their school. By creating a misrepresentation of COURT DOCS!!! This too is a crime.
CC allowed that this matter be deemed to be merely a private matter: and ‘’privileged’’!!
21
Readers of this document are respectfully requested to persue the various matters on the three confidential blogs created for convenient storage.
################################################################################################################
###################################################################################################################
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)