DSS 33 NOV 15 J'ACCUSE! REITERATION / EXPLANATION OF COMPLAINT NO 1

 

 

From: g87@optusnet.com.au

Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 12:18 AM

To: Complaints

Subject: EARLIER ITEM REWRITTEN HERE....J'ACCUSE! REITERATION / EXPLANATION OF COMPLAINT NO 1 against DSS 'FINAL REPORT'

 

THE BELOW HAS CORRECTIONS  ‘FOR CLARITY’ IN ITEMS 1 –2:

IGNORE EARLIER EMAIL PLEASE>

IT HAS BEEN A LONG DAY.....

GS

 

 

 

J'ACCUSE! REITERATION / EXPLANATION OF COMPLAINT NO 1 against DSS 'FINAL REPORT'

 

 

TO DSS MANAGEMENT
I now explain my complaint: ‘GRAVE ERROR NO 1’

SEE ‘DSS 33’ on the blog http://seidnerconfidential.blogspot.com.au/

Where this resides.

 

 

J’ACCUSE!

 

THE DSS DELIBERATELY REWROTE MY CLAIM OF ‘’ZEIMER  - GADENS’’ FRAUDULENTLY RECREATING COURT ORDERS!

 

1. CATHOLIC CARE ACTED ILLEGALLY WHEN THEY  FAILED TO INVESTIGATE ILLEGAL ACTS BY HOWARD ZEIMER – WHO TAMPERED WITH THE CONSENT ORDERS!  INDEED, DR ZEIMER CREATED FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS AND PASSED THEM OFF TO THE CHILDREN’S SCHOOL! AND DSS DELIBERATELY RECONFIGURED MY ACCUSATION OF FRAUD!!! 
2. TO WIT  - BY DELIBERATELY ASKING Catholic C [QUESTION NO.9]   http://seidnerconfidential.blogspot.com.au/2015/10/dss-28-oct-14ethan-to-gs-part-1.html A FALSE / ABSURDITY OF A  QUESTION, DSS ALLOWED CATHOLIC CHURCH TO APPEAR TO HAVE RESPONDED ACCEPTABLY. BY SIMPLY DENYING THE SUBJECT OF THE CLAIM!!!!  THE PLAIN INCONTESTABLE FACT IS THAT ZEIMER AND GADENS Solicitors  CREATED A FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT [NOT CATHOLIC CARE AND GADENS!!]
3. THUS ZEIMER -  GADENS PASSED OFF FRADULENCY TO THE CHILDRENS’ SCHOOL MISREPRESENTING THE COURT ORDERS!
4. AND GADENS KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING IN DOING ZEIMER’S BIDDING!!! PROOF OF THAT IS HOW THEY CONTINUED GAME – PLAYING WITH ME AD NAUSIUM! MASSIVE CORRESPONDENCES TOOK PLACE BETWEEN MYSELF / GADENS AND THE LEGAL SRVICES COMMISSION – PLAINLY THE TROIKA [Z, CC AND LSC] TRIED TO HIDE THE TRUTH!!!!
5. THE SCHOOL MANAGER READ US THE ALLEGED COURT DOCUMENT – AND IT PURPORTED TO CLAIM THAT MY WIFE WAS ALLEGEDLY FORBIDDEN TO GO TO THE CHILDREN’S SCHOOL TO HELP THE SCHOOL – OTHER THAN AT SPECIAL EVENTS relating to our grandchildren.
6. INCIDENTLY THAT ZEIMER ENTITY TOOK AN INTERVENTION ORDER AGAINST US in 2010 - WHICH WAS OVERTURNED VIA $70,000 ill – afforded moneys spent by us on FAMILY COURT ACTION!!
7. THIS LATTER FRAUD HEREIN DESCRIBED effectively forbade us from seeing the other 5  grandchildren ‘not Zeimer’! THIS TOO WAS SICKENING – HOW DARE ZEIMER / GADENS / LSC / CC /DSS ATTEMPT TO FOIST THIS FRAUD ON US?
8. HOWARD ZEIMER HAS TO THIS DAY REFUSED TO ALLOW THE SCHOOL TO RELEASE THE MANIFESTLY FRAUDULENT DOC TO US!!
9. AND OUTRAGEOUSLY INSTRUCTED GADENS JAMES WALKER TO PLAY STUPID GAMES WITH ME WHEREBY GADENS REPEATEDLY WROTE TO ME DELIBERATELY TRYING TO ‘DRIVE ME ‘CRAZY’ VIA THE IDIOTIC STRATEGY OF CLAIMING THAT THE ACTUAL COURT ORDERS WERE THE SAME AS THE ONE DENYING MY WIFE ACCESS TO THE SCHOOL – IN THE HANDS OF THE SCHOOL!!
10. BUT WHEN CATHOLIC CARE WERE SO ADVISED – THEY ALLOWED ZEIMER TO CLAIM ‘PRIVILEGE’ OVER SAID COURT ORDERS FRAUD! THAT MAKES THEIR COMBINED POSITION OF CC AND DSS UNTENABLE!
11. CATHOLIC CARE’S LACK OF INTEREST IN THE FRAUD WAS STUNNING – IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THEY WROTE TO US ASKING US TO BRING THE COURT ORDERS WITH US TO THE MEETING / MEDIATION WITH DR ZEIMER!!
12. THE LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION JOINED THE CLUB OF FRAUDS: THEY ALSO DENIED THE UNDENIABLE. THERE WER DOZENS OF USELESS EMAILS.
13. I WARNED MANAGER Mc GARVIE OF THE LSC – he and his staff treated me with disdain!
14. I ALSO WROTE EARLIER TO MANAGEMENT OF GADENS: THEY IGNORED ME!!
15. WE TOLD CATHOLIC CARE ALL THIS!! SHAME ON THEM ALL!
16. AND HOW ABOUT DSS? THEY REWROTE MY CLAIM ENABLING CATHOLIC CARE TO PLEAD SWEET INNOCENCE!!
    OH – BY THE WAY – DSS FORCED ON US A LIMITED RANGE OF CLAIMS – AND I LET IT PASS THINKING THAT THE 9 or 10 points would be enough! AND I MADE A SLIP IN NOT PICKING UP THEIR DELIBERATE RECONFIGURATION!! TO WIT – I ALLOWED THE FRAUDULENT MISNOMER THROUGH WHEREBY THE STRANGE AMALGAMATION OF CATHOLIC CARE AND GADENS WAS WHAT BECAME THE CLAIM!!
17. AND OF COURSE – CATHOLIC CARE SHOULD HAVE PICKED IT UP AS WELL – BUT THEY PLAYED ‘CUTE’ TO WHAT THEY THOUGHT WAS A PROVERBIASL ‘GIFTHORSE’!!!
18. OH – AND IF THEY WERE REMOTELY SALIENT OR HONEST OR COMPETENT [ choose your weapons of defence Ethan!] – THE DSS SHOULD HAVE PICKED IT UP AS WELL!!!
19. IE ASSUMING THEY MAKE THE ABSURD CLAIM THAT IT WAS ALL A GIGANTIC MISTAKE!
20. IN THE CONTEXT OF ALL THE OTHER GIGANTIC MISTAKES – TO BE ELUCIDATED -  DSS POSITION IS UNTENNABLE!
21. THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF PAGES BACKING UP ALL THIS AND MORE!
    ESPECIALLY THE OUTRAGEOUS OVERSEER OF MORALITY – THE LSC!
22. THEY ARE ALL CROOKS! What a troika!

SEE THE BELOW: I have left it largely intact: it was an earlier version of the above.

gs

#############################################################################################################
##################################################################################################################

I am in receipt of  your ‘FINAL REPORT’ sent via email yesterday.

See it appended as per link here. http://seidnerconfidential.blogspot.com.au/2015/11/dss-31-ex-nov-12final-response-from.html

As agreed kindly send me a ‘hard copy’ as earlier discussed.

Please note that I am somewhat disturbed by your department’s findings. In due course it is expected that much more will be written on various failures of the DSS.

Simultaneously I will be commencing communication with other parties. SOON.

It is reasonable for me to think kindly of the DSS: that if merely with respect to this single misrepresentation – your people will want to correct it.

It matters not much for now. Note that all this is prima facie documentation / evidence in / via my next actions -  that you surely must answer SOON.

You are kindly requested to comment as below. And you may care to await my further comments via email ...soon....

While it is plainly obvious that this matter is going to be reviewed by other authorities,  for now you are requested to note that I restrict myself to merely two [3] grave errors of the DSS.

MORE TO COME NEXT EMAILS!

By far the most serious is the DSS misrepresentation of my claim DSS 22 below ‘’...that  Gadens solicitors or Zeimer wrote to the grandchildren’s school...’’ 

IT BECAME SOMETHING ELSE VIA THE DSS MISREPRESENTING IT THUS:

AS FOLLOWS:

‘’9. That Catholic Care and Gadens solicitors, wrote to the grandchildren’s school, banning you and your wife from visiting their school by misrepresenting Court Documents.

NOTE – my claim was that it was ‘either Zeimer or Gadens solicitors’!!

Via this misrepresentation Catholic Care was allowed by DSS investigator to claim per your FINAL REPORT:

9. That CatholicCare and Gadens solicitors, wrote to the grandchildren’s school, banning you and your wife from visiting their school by misrepresenting Court Documents.CatholicCare has advised the Department that they did not write to or have any contact with the children’s school.  There is no evidence on its file, or assessed as part of this review of your complaint, to support this claim.The Department considers that the explanation provided by CatholicCare Melbourne is appropriate and no further action will be taken

THIS MEMO WILL CONTINUE SOON -  AS I WISH YOU TO CONTEMPLATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF NOT ONLY MISREPRESENTING MY CLAIMS – BUT VIA THE MANIFEST MISREPRENTATION OF SAID CLAIMS PLAINLY CREATING A CHIMERA IN ALLOWING CATHOLIC CARE TO PLAINLY MISLEAD YOU – TO THUS PLAINLY TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOUR INVESTIGATOR’S NAIVETE – AND IN THE PROCESS ENABLED A COVER UP OF FRAUD.

This is serious business.

In consideration to the other major misrepresentations that I will elucidate SOON

Regards

Geoff Seidner

Again – please note that there are other matters your department will need to address; and so obviously correct grave errors that are will be obvious to other parties.