Thursday, September 17, 2015

DSS 19 To Ethan - EMAIL NO 2 17/9/15 'EXPANDED' DOT POINTS

Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 3:25 PM
Subject: To Ethan - EMAIL NO 2 17/9/15 'EXPANDED' DOT POINTS

Department of Social Services, Australian Government
Feedback Coordination Team
Ph:     1800 634 035
Fax:    (02) 6133 8442
Email: complaints@dss.gov.au
Post:   Feedback, PO Box 7576, Canberra Business Centre, ACT 2610
Dear Ethan
Thank you for conversation yesterday morning
I now supply a series of claims BELOW - VERY broadly based on my summary, last item in this email. And here: http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/cc-july-12.html
All material remain undenied and multiple – times and referred to and essentially completely confirmed by CATHOLIC CARE in subsequent emails and letters.
Kindly note that the much – desired dot points / summary of our complaint –was as  per the earlier email that was sent you minutes ago.
Thank you for your understanding.
Regards
Geoff Seidner.
1
He wants contact with us suspended: and blames us for Dina’s incontinence and anxiety made worse for seeing us monthly for 4 hours.
Catholic Care’s chief practitioner Elizabeth Jenkins read all of the following shamelessly to us. We tried to tell the woman that he has tried [banning us under the aegis of ‘’suspension’’] this many times before. To no avail – she was not even seemingly  aware of the incongruous idiocy of what she mouthed.
Yet there are so many aspects of Family Law wherein she was obliged to report matters – if merely re section 7.2 to 7.8 of their own interpretation of FAMILY LAW!  SEE MY NEXT EMAIL – I send again this list of their own interpretation of Family Law ex my earlier sending of Sept. 6.
Never mind that merely this is a clear indicator that Zeimer was not making a genuine attempt at FDR – and she was ensuring this! ILLEGAL PLAINLY – especially of one reads:  
And of course, merely this small part :
‘’ANY MATTER CONSIDERS  RELEVANT TO THE FDR’’
‘’MAKE A GENUINE EFFORT TO RESOLVE ISSUES’’
2
He / she continued with  a conflated laundry – list of  blaming us – including  the children’s school honouring their mother with a mosaic. Anywhere else this would be deemed risible and sickening simultaneously, if that is possible.
3
Note that he claims that the mosaic has made her incontinence worse!
4
And of course Dina is claimed to be distressed / ‘’suffered from anxiety’’ from seeing us. in spite of evidence proffered by us to the contrary: everywhere in these blogs and conveyed to Catholic Care duo immediately and in documentary evidence which they refused to acknowledge as well.
5
Zeimer claims to have undisclosed medical advice attesting to his absurdities. Much like the  fraudulent psychologists claimed in his immoral INTERVENTION ORDER of 2009 taken against us – over -  ruled by the FAMILY COURT in granting us access to our loving grandchildren. We tried to convey this to the CC duo – and later via my lodged documents to their legal team.
Very soon the Catholic Care supra – management at the Archdiocese realized they had a problem: US! Very soon they saw fit  to create a meeting  / need to be interviewed by my person. See also references below to their HIGH RISK PERSON!!! Accidently sent to me!
6
Dr. Zeimer said  that it will be OK for us to see the children at public events at the children's school.  [BUT NOT TO GIVE THEM BIRTHDAY PRESENTS!] Thus he feigned reasonableness through his oft – revisited multiple travesties. ALL A SHAM WE TRIED TO CONVEY TO CC ENTITIES.
7
There are to be no contacts between the children and ourselves. Simply shameless.
8A
I note for the record that you,  Elizabeth decided on your own self -  claimed initiative that Dr Howard Zeimer and ourselves would not meet. these were your words. Thus the artifice of artless chimera of the Shuttle!
This is close to illegal when it cannot be explained without connotations that go to the sickening biased determination by Jenkins to ensure their would be no meaningful FDR! Certainly very improper when she refused to answer why? See the files: I suspect there was an ‘unhealthy’ relationship between Zeimer and Jenkins – elicited if merely in her adamant refusal to explain her protection of Zeimer – given all we told her. AND all that resides in my blogs: see links below.
Can someone explain the bloody – minded obstinate, tainted decision?
WORSE: she also mislead us. Thus when I asked her why in her letter she did not warn us that she would disable the barest element if any possible success for mediation – she refused to respond! Indeed: look at the entire context and let someone postulate something else other than what is herein!
She broke the law when she ensured that the barest elements for success of FDR which were vitiated unilaterally by her.
So she admits sort of! 
8B
Possibly worse is that Jenkins formally allowed Dr Howard Zeimer to not need to follow the Family Court  Consent Orders of 2012 by announcing that Dr Zeimer will no longer need to bring the children! In plainly unilaterally refusing therewith to bring the children to comply with legal obligations [without any evidence of / for justification] to their loving grandparents, and Jenkins plainly approving – she has opened the door of criminal sanction against Catholic Care and sanction against Howard Zeimer.
8C
           Howard Zeimer acted in unison with Catholic Care illegally – see 8B above. But it was much worse: Howard Zeimer continues to be IN BREACH OF CURRENT COURT ORDERS IN NOT SEEKING / DARING TO APPROACH THE FAMILY COURT TO CHANGE THESE ORDERS. Plainly he has been leaked the CATHOLIC CARE documents by Catholic Care who have obviously warned Zeimer what surely awaits him if he follows what seemed to be a good idea when he gave some sort of consideration to Catholic Care in his secret agreement re their deliberate unison in debauching of the FDR process!
THAT IS SOME SENTENCE!
How else does one explain the obvious?
To wit – to this day Zeimer has not dared to make an Application to change the CONSENT ORDERS!
  • He must now appreciate that his lies and deliberate fraudulences have finally caught up with him with consequences re the ORIGINAL FAMILY COURT SCAMS.
  • The lies therein with respect to criminal charges as a result of what will be uncovered: I refer to merely one Affidavit of Sara Amzalak providing photographic evidence that Howarde Zeimer lied re claiming my wife Eva ‘stole’ her seat.
  • We will claim many other matters relating to actions of Peter Adler and the plain fact of Adler also being caught deliberately claiming documents were [illegally!] destroyed by Adler when we asked for same – only to cluelessly releasing same to the hapless Gadens / Zeimer congruence!
  • And Gadens subsequently acted illegally!
  • As a result we will demand from Zeimer to not only allow us unrestricted accerss to the wonderfull grandchildren – but a refund from Zeimer and Gadens of probably $80,000 of legal fees they foisted on us with multiple frauds in multiple realms!
  • Even a refund from Catholic Care!!!
There is much here for the Attorney General and Registrar of The Family Court!!!
Virtually nothing mentioned  in the 3 blogs devoted to CC / Zeimer / DSS
congruence
ˈkɒŋɡrʊəns/
noun
  1. agreement or harmony; compatibility.
    "the results show quite good congruence with recent studies"
    synonyms: compatibility, consistency, conformity, match, balance, consonance,rapport, parallelism, congruity; More
9
Furthermore, I accuse Catholic Care of deliberately destroying documents or being WILFULLY BLIND[!] Or both.
In that the legal duo whom I interviewed on July 30 claimed there were no documents in the file indicating improper behaviour By Jenkins and the man ‘’wearing a beatified look’’
I fail to understand how they could claim this and to not attempt to debunk anything of ‘mine’ in the 3 blogs created for these correspondences! There are hundreds of facts inconvenient either not debunked – or shamelessly essentially confirmed by them!!!!
SEE THIS – part reproduced ex  cc18   29/7/15!!!!!!!!!!!
 ..................................................................................

cc18 ,,,Response Fom Nick1 pm 29/7/15

From: Nick Collins
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 1:00 PM
To: 'g87'
Subject: RE: ANALYSIS OF YOUR 'YELLOW SHEETS AND MORE

Hi Geoff
Thank you for sending through some further emails re your concerns with our process and FDR more broadly.  I will review with Alan Baker before we meet so we are both across the issues you have raised when we meet.
Yours sincerely
Nick 
...........................................................................................................................................................
###########################
 HERE ARE THE 3 BLOGS: Contains most of the correspondences – and all the emails:
    CATHOLIC CARE !!!
   DSS
At the same time they panicked in sending my latest to their MANAGER OF HIGH RISK!!! http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/2015/08/cc27-128jill-lane-manager-of-quality.html
And note these too!
11
Elizabeth Jenkins asked that we bring the PARENTING ORDERS to the first meeting. When we told her what Dr Zeimer had done in misrepresentation – she amazingly showed no interest.
I thought an opportunity would exist wherein we would be able to ask Dr Zeimer.
How wrong I was: INSTEAD JENKINS MUST HAVE AT THIS POINT DECIDED TO PROTECT DR ZEIMER BY ENSURING WE WOULD NEVER MEET! THUS HER SHAM SHUTTLE – SYSTEM!
12
Dr Howard Zeimer – the father, together with Gadens solicitor’s James Walker – and with the outrageous permission / blessing of the LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION created a FRAUDULENT document in passing off said FRAUDULENT document to the children’s school.
This was manifestly a fraud: the exact technical term matters not: THEY DELIBERATELY SET OUT TO MISREPRESENT THE PARENTING ORDERS
  • CONTRAVENTION OF PARENTING ORDERS BY ZEIMER AND GADENS IN CREATING / MANUFACTURING A FRAUDULENT DOC!
  • ALLOWING AND PLAINLY INSTRUCTING GADENS TO FRAUD – CREATION!
  • ALLOWING BY ZEIMER AND GADENS:  FOR THE LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION TO  SUPPORT AN ILLEGAL ACT!
Note that very few docs can be seen beyond this: http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/cc1-july-9-to-yeshivah.html
Plainly the Attorney General will have to investigate as will the Registrar of the Family Court.
Documentary evidence is being withheld for now so as to not complicate these matters.
HOWEVER – ELIZABETH JENKINS allowed all this via her comments that Howard Zeimer’s acts were ‘’PRIVILEGED’’
How does she dare allow multiple illegalities – see the files – and worse  here:  under the absurd aegis of ‘PRIVILEGE’’??!!
Amazingly, a close examination of their [CC’s] multiple comments indicate plainly that they wish to use the privacy excuse to break the law! This is littered throughout.....
And this gets worse in claiming to be interested ‘’in the interest of the children’’ – and plainly she cares not about the incessant bullying of the children by the parents, causing trauma to them – and conflating this by blaming us!
Disgraceful and illegal and sickening behaviour by the parents – which should immediately be investigated.
and merely this herein from their own documents:
WHAT UTTER, CONTEMPTUOUS HYPOCRACY!!!
THE YELLOW SHEETS IN MAIN HEADINGS
I now list various key 'motherhood - type' words phrases that are extant in said yellow documents All deserve extrapolation at a later date.
  1. BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD
  2. IMPROVE COMMUNICATION
  3. REDUCE CONFLICT
  4. ANY MATTER CONSIDERS  RELEVANT TO THE FDR
  5. MAKE A GENUINE EFFORT TO RESOLVE ISSUES
  6. PRIVACY .. and mercifully no more for now.././,/,;.,.,.
MATTERS IGNORED BY YOU!
13
I advise that various lists have been made – the latest being these two:
 http://cognateconfidential.blogspot.com.au/2015/09/this-being-stored-warehoused-as-per-my.html    A rough series of points ex my CC blog: VERY IMPORTANT
and
http://seidnerconfidential.blogspot.com.au/2015/09/dss-9sept-13-overview-of-my-complaint.html  Greater detail relating to above................ALSO VERY IMPORTANT
Much resides in this pair of documents and elsewhere.
Much concerns the lack of credibility of CATHOLIC Care entities and by implication Dr Howard Zeimer  his wife and acolytes of  Dr Zeimer.
Regards. Ethan
Geoff Seidner
17 Sept 2015
###########################
###########################
DR ZEIMER WANTS / SAID: E&OE.
  1. He wants contact with us suspended till December 2016  till after Dina' batmitzwah in November 2016.
  2. He mentioned that Dina is suffering from incontinence that he attributes to seeing us.
  3. Dr Zeimer told you that she was suffering thus before ... but she is now very anxious.
  4. Dr Zeimer went on to tell you that her anxiousness was manifest days before and for several days after our incipient meeting.
  5. And Dr Zeimer also said that the MURAL (as he calls the mozaic) that is being made / contributions by former teachers, friends, anyone who knew her is welcome to participate in helping create it.
  6. I cannot help but mention that our synagogue produced a HAGADDAH FOR PASSOVER in Ruchie’s honour: DR ZEIMER REFUSED THE CHILDREN PERMISSION TO ACCEPT SAME FROM US. Oh dear – I promised not to make value – judgements – even valueless judgements!  Haggadah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  7. We are honoured that the school where our daughter was a valued teacher and where her children currently go to school ... have seen fit to honour our daughter Rachel ( Ruchie) Zeimer.
  8. Dr. Zeimer also told you that Dina has suffered from anxiety as a result of  the partially completed mosaic. In spite of it to be honouring her mother.
  9. Dr. Zeimer also told you that Dina has suffered from anxiety on the days prior to her seeing us and for several days thereafter.
  10. AND THAT THE MOZAIC HAS MADE IT WORSE. So you told us.
  11. Dr Zeimer also conveyed to you that he has had medical / psychological advice along the above / attesting to the above being caused by  our wonderful grandchild's monthly visits to us.
  12. Dr Zeimer declined too give us any further information. Nor the identity of said psychologists: it is presumed that there may be two of them.
  13. It is however somehow presumed that the entities are not the entities who contributed to his IVO he issued against us around 2009 ??? Which was overturned by us being granted access to the children three years ago.
  14. Dr. Zeimer said to you that it will be OK for us to see the children at public events at the children's school.
  15. Arising from that, I asked Dr Zeimer to release the MARCH 2012 document he or his solicitor sent to the children's school advising the school that we are not allowed to go to the school premises. The school read us the document: we were so advised. Dr Zeimer later told us on July 7 that the document is ''privileged''  He  refused to release it nor allow the school to release it. Nor did he claim that our visits to the school in any way breached our agreement of FEB 2012. NOR did he comment on it further than above. Kindly confirm that this too was discussed. [in substantially greater length.]
  16. DR ZEIMER ALSO TOLD YOU:  that we are not allowed to give birthday presents to the children.
  17. He said that he will pass these presents on to the children if they are given to him. He insists that there be  be no direct contact between grandparents and our grandchildren via these presents or any other....
  18. Dr. Zeimer advised you that our grandson Reuvi will write to us - on his own terms.I am not sure what this means ......
  19. Dr Zeimer asked you to convey to us that Dina will  also write to us: ostensively about our estrangement to be.
  20. I note for the record that you,  Elizabeth decided on your own self -  claimed initiative that Dr Howard Zeimer and ourselves would not meet. these were your words.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)